Litigation Daily
Litigation Daily is an online patent lawsuit database that collects details on the latest US patent litigation cases. Critical information includes the prosecution and post-proceedings history, possible validity issues, and the potential prior art of the patents involved in US district court, ITC, and PTAB cases. Spot potential opportunities by simply performing a patent lawsuit search.
For more specific search results, please select your desired court and case filing dates:
Duration:
Jurisdiction:
0 new cases in District Court, 2 in PTAB, and 0 in ITC.
27 new cases in District Court, 25 in PTAB, and 0 in ITC.
There are no cases filed today. Clickto find cases filed in last 7 days.
PATENTS WITH QUALITY ISSUES 90 % 72 Applications
90% COMPOSITION
Quantity of Applications

To Access more patent data, simply click the button below!

Expand all to the insights of asserted patents
Filing Date
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-25
NXP US INC (19,231)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
Filing Date
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-25
ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO BETRIEBS KG (1,225)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC (31)
LG ELECTRONICS INC (455,502)
LG ELECTRONICS US INC (0)
District of New Jersey
2-21-cv-19234
5
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Double Patenting
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Double Patenting
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
PARUS HOLDINGS INC (52)
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP (385)
Eastern District of Texas
2-21-cv-00395
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Filing Date
Patent Owner (# of Patents Owned)
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
HEARTBEET LTD (31)
HUMAN POWER OF N CO (0)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
Filing Date
Patent Owner (# of Patents Owned)
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
ZEAVISION LLC (106)
BAUSCH & LOMB INC (10,242)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Double Patenting
Filing Date
Patent Owner (# of Patents Owned)
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (1,691)
PNC BANK NA (0)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
Filing Date
Patent Owner (# of Patents Owned)
Petitioner (# of Patents Owned)
Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
KMIZRA LLC (251)
FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC (152)
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 101
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
PARUS HOLDINGS INC (52)
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (0)
Eastern District of Texas
2-21-cv-00393
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103
Filing Date
Plaintiff (# of Patents Owned)
Defendant (# of Patents Owned)
Court / Case No.
# of Patents in Litigation
2021-10-22
PARUS HOLDINGS INC (52)
BANK OF AMERICA CORP (12,198)
Eastern District of Texas
2-21-cv-00394
1
Patent No.
# of Rejection(s)
Related Proceedings
Novelty & Eligibility Issues
§ 102 Ref. in History
§ 103 Ref. in History
35 U.S.C.§ 112
35 U.S.C.§ 102
35 U.S.C.§ 103

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Client Relationship Building and Business Opportunity Management

Attorneys can keep-up-to-date with recent patent cases, quickly grasp the current litigation market situation, and respond to any client issues immediately. Additionally, Litigation Daily helps attorneys to provide suitable professional services and support to their clients accordingly.

2. Foresee Litigation Issues

Stay ahead of the game and exercise caution when dealing with the litigation market with recent patent cases. Litigation Daily can be used to foresee any future litigation issues that may affect your business, thus allowing you to stay prepared at all times.

The number of patents listed for each plaintiff, defendant, patent owner, and petitioner is calculated by the total number of patents that this particular current assignee has obtained. This information is gathered using Patentcloud’s powerful database.

When there is no visible ITC data, it means that there are no recently filed ITC cases to look into.

Litigation Daily provides the number of patents owned by the named specific assignee only, the data does not include any related affiliates. As for the number of patents from the Patent Search results, this number is calculated with the standardized assignee, which includes all names of the specific assignee.

Sign up to Patent Search to uncover all of the patent data for related affiliates.

We only displayed the patent number of that particular assignee; therefore, if the assignee has other names, the data will not be captured.

When the number of patents owned is displayed as 0, it may indicate:

  • The plaintiff is not the patent owner, but has the exclusive licensing authority.
  • The patent assignment data has not yet being registered at USPTO

Why are some file wrapper data not available?

  • We only provide data that can be retrieved online, which are the patents granted after 2003. Therefore, the specific patent you are looking into may have been granted before 2003.
  • The patent at issue may simply have no rejections.